When is summary judgement appropriate in a design patent case? SPIGEN v. ULTRAPROOF
Tag: obvious
When is summary judgement appropriate in a design patent case? SPIGEN v. ULTRAPROOF
United States patent law allows an inventor to apply for a design patent for any new and non-obvious ornamental design for an article of manufacture. The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture”
Toy manufacturers battle over transforming patent. CHOIROCK v. SPIN MASTER
After a patent is granted it is not immune from attack. Inter partes review is a trial proceeding conducted at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to review the patentability of one or more claims
Patentee found not entitled presumption of nexus for secondary considerations. FOX v. SRAM
After a patent is granted, if a member of the public discovers prior art which would render a patented invention obvious, that member of the public can request an inter partes review of the patent. Inter
Cooking oil sensor on deep fryer patent upheld. HENNY PENNY v. FRYMASTER
The owner of a patent is granted the exclusive right to make, use, sell and import the invention claimed in the patent. In the United States patents are granted by the United States Patent and
When does two different publications make an invention obvious?
When an inventor creates an invention the inventor can protect their invention with a patent. A patent is a set of exclusive rights granted, by a government, to the inventor of an invention. To get
What does it mean when an invention is obvious?
To get a patent for your invention in the United States one of the requirements is that your invention must not be obvious. This requirement is found in 35 U.S.C. § 103. The section essentially