Preliminary injunction denied in trademark dispute between breweries named for ocean currents. LOW TIDE v. TIDELAND
Tag: trademark
Preliminary injunction denied in trademark dispute between breweries named for ocean currents. LOW TIDE v. TIDELAND
A trademark is something that a producer of goods or services uses to distinguish their products in the marketplace. Anything that serves the purpose of telling consumers who produced a product can be eligible for
Jury not given the definition of “willful” $95 million trademark judgement vacated. VARIETY v. WALMART
A trademark is something that tells consumers who produced a product. A trademark can be registered to strengthened the rights associated with the trademark, but registration is not required to begin using a trademark, and
Art shows sues the town it is named after for trademark infringement. LQAF v. CITY OF LA QUINTA
Trademark law draws its strength from consumer protection laws. The rationale for granting a trademark user the exclusive right to brand goods with a trademark is to prevent consumers from being tricked into buying inferior
Dismissal of trademark lawsuit against print on demand website, reversed. OSU v. REDBUBBLE
Trademark law in the United States grants the owner of a trademark the right to exclude others from using a trademark in a way that is likely to cause consumer confusion. Trademark infringement is the unauthorized
Zoom Sues RingCentral For Trademark Infringement
Trademarks are valuable pieces of intellectual property. Companies expend significant sums to promote their trademarks to the public. The association a consumer makes between a trademark and a high quality product is an indicator of
SKULL trademark for distilled spirits canceled for nonuse. GLOBEFILL v. CALAVERA
A trademark is something that the producer of a product uses to distinguish its products from competitors. Trademark holders are granted the exclusive right to brand products with their trademark. The motivation behind trademark law
Insurance companies spar over ownership of BANKERS LIFE trademark. CDOC v. LIBERTY
Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act provides that the United States Patent and Trademark Office may refuse to register a trademark if it so resembles a prior used or registered mark “as to be likely,
Color coded system for dental adhesive can’t be trademarked because it is functional. SULZER MIXPAC v. AN TRADING
A trademark is traditionally thought of as a word, phrase or symbol that a manufacturer places on their products. However, just about anything that signals to consumers the identity of the company that produced a
Retailer of kids football uniforms accused of infringing on POP WARNER trademark.
Trademark law is intended to protect consumers from being tricked into buying inferior quality goods. A trademark is something that a manufacturer uses to brand its products. Traditionally a trademark is considered a word phrase
Trademark application for plastic products blocked by similar paper product trademark. IN RE ELKAY PLASTICS
Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act provides that the United States Patent and Trademark Office may refuse to register a trademark if it so resembles a prior used or registered mark “as to be likely,